At The Episcopal Church’s 2012 General
Convention, one momentous July day (Tuesday the tenth, to be precise), the
House of Deputies passed a resolution to create a task force to look at the
church’s structure. The vote was officially unanimous (the few “nays”
near me not being audible beyond a few tables), whereupon the convention center
rang out with joyful song:
Sing
a new church into being,
One in faith and love and praise.
One in faith and love and praise.
OK, a bit over the top: All we did
was to approve creating a committee, which is not precisely what Jesus came to
do. But the Convention itself, notably in its actions that particular day
including this one, seemed to close one very long chapter in our Church’s life,
and open the page to a new one.
Returning home, I realized that I’ve led
all 40 years of my life as deacon and priest within the context of dramatic
change and, thus, controversy and conflict. By 1972, issues of civil
rights, liturgy, and the role of women in leadership had already begun to tear
at the fabric of the Church, persisting for decades more and joined by
questions of sexuality and of relationships with the greater Anglican
Communion. Big questions, these: How do we relate to the
world? How do we worship? Who can be involved in leadership?
Who is eligible to receive rites and sacraments? What is the nature of
our relationship with others in the church, on every level?
Forty years later, the 77th Convention
nearly finished answering them. That beastly hot day in Indianapolis, the
Deputies—the clergy and laity forming one of the two houses in our bicameral
legislature, bishops being the other—voted (a) to say absolutely nothing about
the “Anglican Covenant” which concerned our involvement with others in the
Communion; (b) voted that task force; (c) elected the Rev. Gay Jennings as its
president, who is keenly committed to examining how we function as a church;
(d) by 75+% margins, approved liturgies for blessings of relationships,
including those of same-sex couples, all but ending the last of those
controversies. (The House of Bishops agreed.)
It was as if to say, Here we are, for
better or worse. Here we stand. Four decades of pilgrimage and
change is drawing to an end. We are becoming a new church.
So where are we now? Who are
we? How do we relate to each other? What are the characteristics of
what Jesus calls us to be and to do? How do we cherish what we have
inherited while incorporating what is new? And, above all, how do we
serve our Lord in our own ever-new day?
In fact, we’ve begun to envision the
answers to those questions. My own diocese, Southwestern
Virginia, endorsed the outlines of just such a vision in
2012. That task force will be developing something similar between now
and the 2015 General Convention.
Visioning is one thing. Living out
the vision is another. And that’s what this blog aims to be about.
Like any vision of the church at any time, it aims to be grounded in both the
Bible and in Anglican theology and practice, while also being pragmatic.
Fortunately, the Anglican tradition is usually eminently practical.
About once a week, I plan on posting some
musings on orders, congregations, mission, relationships, exciting things
happening that manifest the vision which I believe the Spirit is leading us to
perceive.
I hope that my thoughts will generate other
thoughts and discussion; and that’s exactly what I invite. Whether or not
you agree with me, opinions, like gifts, vary; when we share them, like the
best of parish pot-luck suppers, we feast. As the song says:
Let
us bring the gifts that differ
and, in splendid, varied ways,
sing a new church into being,
one in faith and love and praise.
and, in splendid, varied ways,
sing a new church into being,
one in faith and love and praise.
Very nice, my friend. Well put. I'm glad to see you here in the blogosphere ...
ReplyDeleteLauren Stanley